Thanks for your confirmation. Can anyone else report a case like that? I
didn't progress much in finding an explanation so far. If anyone else could
confirm, maybe this is some kind of common problem, maybe even a bug?
Is there something like a public issue tracker? Still, more cases would help,
don't want to bug developers offering such a great project and in the end it
turns out that I made a mistake...
Have a nice weekend everyone!
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] Im Auftrag von mardo
Gesendet: Freitag, 13. August 2010 14:46
An: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Betreff: Re: [rules-users] fireUntilHalt() and OSGi - CPU load
"When invoking fireUntilHalt() for my StatefulKnowledgeSession, CPU load
rises to 25% (meaning one complete core on the quad-core machine)."
I can confirm this issue. Below is a minimal example. I have noticed that in
DefaultAgenda, missedNotifyAll is always true in this case, is this an
intended behaviour?
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<definitions id="Definition"
targetNamespace="http://www.jboss.org/drools"
typeLanguage="http://www.java.com/javaTypes"
expressionLanguage="http://www.mvel.org/2.0"
xmlns="http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/20100524/MODEL"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xs:schemaLocation="http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/20100524/MODEL
BPMN20.xsd"
xmlns:g="http://www.jboss.org/drools/flow/gpd"
xmlns:tns="http://www.jboss.org/drools">
<process processType="Private" isExecutable="true"
id="servicerequest2"
name="servicerequest.b" >
<!-- nodes -->
<startEvent id="_1" name="Manual Trigger (Customer Calls)"
g:x="19"
g:y="124" g:width="48" g:height="48" />
<endEvent id="_19" name="End" g:x="463"
g:y="148" g:width="48"
g:height="48" >
<terminateEventDefinition/>
</endEvent>
<userTask id="_22" name="Initialize Service Request Process"
g:x="139"
g:y="234" g:width="100" g:height="48" >
<potentialOwner>
<resourceAssignmentExpression>
<formalExpression>john</formalExpression>
</resourceAssignmentExpression>
</potentialOwner>
</userTask>
<!-- connections -->
<sequenceFlow id="_22-_19" sourceRef="_22"
targetRef="_19" />
<sequenceFlow id="_1-_22" sourceRef="_1"
targetRef="_22" />
</process>
</definitions>
public void test() throws InterruptedException{
try {
// load up the knowledge base
KnowledgeBase kbase = readKnowledgeBase();
final StatefulKnowledgeSession ksession =
kbase.newStatefulKnowledgeSession();
WSHumanTaskHandler wsh = new WSHumanTaskHandler();
wsh.setConnection("127.0.0.1", 9123);
ksession.getWorkItemManager().registerWorkItemHandler("Human Task", wsh);
new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
ksession.fireUntilHalt();
}
}).start();
ksession.startProcess("servicerequest2");
} catch (Throwable t) {
t.printStackTrace();
}
Thread.sleep(1200000);
}
private static KnowledgeBase readKnowledgeBase() throws Exception {
KnowledgeBuilder kbuilder =
KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder();
kbuilder.add(ResourceFactory.newClassPathResource("testcases/integrationuc/se
rvicerequest.bpmn"),
ResourceType.BPMN2);
return kbuilder.newKnowledgeBase();
}
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/fireUntilHalt-and-OSG...
U-load-tp1022352p1131701.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users