Thanks, please provide a specific example rule too.
Don't forget to keep your posts to the mailing list for the good of the
community.
On 12 October 2010 22:18, Kumar Pandey <kumar.pandey(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Michale
Thanks for the response.
Here's the link for the thread .
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Check-if-fact-is-subs...
and the original about matching strings in two arrays.
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Matching-strings-in-t...
My use case is that I could have hundreds of rule and each rule could have
its own set of strings.
A fact object is run through these rules to see which ones are fired.
One of the condition to check is that the a list in the fact is not a
subset of list in the rule.
That is fire the rule only if list in fact is not a subset of list in rule.
Thanks
Kumar
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com
> wrote:
> OK, I admit I don't have the original thread anymore.
>
> If I am not wrong (which is always a possibility) for Wolfgang's operator
> to work you'd need to externalise the superset from the rule into
> WorkingMemory. You could have a rule with higher salience construct the
> superset WM fact.
>
> If you don't mind re-posting or providing a link to the complete thread
> (on Nabble or somewhere) I'll happily try to help further.
>
> On 12 October 2010 17:23, <kumar.pandey(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> <quote author='Michael Anstis-2'>
>>
>> Wolfgang gave a great solution.
>> </quote>
>> Don't know if I'm missing something obvious here. I have a superset in
>> the rule itself. Each rule has a superset list. In this case how would I use
>> Wolfgang's solution. Its comparing through two arrays in runtime. I have not
>> been able to construct an array construct with specific values in the rule
>> itself.
>>
>
>