Re: [rules-users] Accessing globals after FireAllRules

Awesome! This worked Thank you very much Wolfgang!! Though, I have a architectural question My use case is in "claims processing" and here are the steps that need to happen 1) Recieve patients claim (prescription claim, like medicines) 2) Retrieve the patients Claim History (use patient ID in claim) 3) Retrieve the drug information (use RxID in claim) 4) Subject the claim to the rules in drools 5) Respond with rule results (show the contributing claims that caused the rules to fire) for this , I created a Rule flow Step 2) and 3) are rule tasks that ONLY fetch information Step 4) I want to write the rules (mix of java helper classes and drl) and subject the claim to that Step 5) return the results (via the List option that you just gave me) Is this the way people use the Rule Flow? Do you see anyting fundamentally wrong here? Do you think I should you Stateless sessions instead of rule flow? Do let me know -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Accessing-globals-after-FireAllRules-tp... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.