Re: [rules-users] Implementing Refraction with Drools
"poor" is a relative word. It might be fast enough for many people.
If we were to implement this in the core of the code, we could avoid a fair bit of the
work you are doing. As we implement "modify in place" all we need to do is
ignore any activations that are re-actives via a modify. We wouldn't need to do any
tracking.
Mark
On 13 Mar 2013, at 17:50, jrh3 <jrh3(a)att.com> wrote:
Yes, thanks, I think that will do it. Now back to the performance
question:
earlier in this thread it was mentioned that this strategy had poor
performance. How bad is it? Is there any other alternative in Drools 5.5?
-Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Implementing-Refraction-with-Drools-tp4...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users