Re: [rules-users] Why all rule condition fired when insert object in drools session?

Hi Zhao, You could insert a helper fact and use it as a first pattern in your conditions. That way, the engine will not evaluate too many patterns from rules that are not to be executed. When ActiveGroup(name == "GroupA") ... Then ... Implications * You will have to take care of the status of ActiveGroup and update its value yourself. Make sure you do it at the appropriate moment. (Low salience rule?) * You would have to re-evaluate the need for the agenda-group. Its functinos are taken over by the fact, do you still need the group? * Whether it will improve performance or not is a whole different question all together and is depending on your ruleset. I never did severe testing on it, but imho, there are certainly cases where the agenda-group is faster than the fact. As a rule of thumb, I would say that if you do a lot of update/modify calls in your consequences, you might get an improvement by blocking the evaluation of patterns early. Regards, Frank PS You could also create a different fact per agenda-group. It should be mildly faster while providing quite a lot less flexibility. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Why-all-rule-condition-fired-when-inser... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.