Assuming that the remaining 19998 rules are of the same kind, there is a
lot of data in these rules, and only very little logic. Ignoring the issue
of "Olympia" being one of the cities not being "Seattle", we have the
problem of matching a triplet of <field,state,city> from a Student fact so
that we can store one or more Subjects in Student.subjects.
Imagine that you have objects of type Inscribe containing a triplet of
field, state, city and the pertaining List<Subject>. Then you could write a
single (!) rule
rule register
when
$stu: Student ( $f: field, $s: state, $c: city )
$ins: Inscribe( field==$f, state==$s, city==$c )
then
$stu.setSubjects( $ins.getSubjects() );
end
BTW: Why do you use equals with state? Using "==" should be possible here,
too.
And, of course, matching ~20000 different triplets to facts of a single
type isn't really RBS fodder. You can design a simple Java program that
achieves this goal, assuming you can come up with a straightforward
representation of the <field,state,city;subject+> mapping.
-W
2012/1/10 Shweta1986 <shweta.a.thakkar(a)gmail.com>
My rules are as follows.
rule "rule1"
salience -2
dialect "mvel"
when
stud : Student ( field == "ARTS", state.equals("WA"))
then
java.util.List subList = new java.util.ArrayList();
Subject subject = new Subject();
subject.setName("ABC");
subject.setFees(33454);
subject.duration(4);
subList.add(subject);
subject = new Subject();
subject.setName("XYZ");
subject.setFees(33454);
subject.duration(4);
subList.add(subject);
stud.setSubjects(subList);
end
rule "rule2"
salience -100
dialect "mvel"
when
stud : Student ( field == "ARTS", state.equals("WA") , city ==
"SEATTLE"))
then
java.util.List subList = new java.util.ArrayList();
Subject subject = new Subject();
subject.setName("ABC");
subject.setFees(33454);
subject.duration(4);
subList.add(subject);
subject = new Subject();
subject.setName("XYZ");
subject.setFees(33454);
subject.duration(4);
subList.add(subject);
stud.setSubjects(subList);
end
Student is the main object and it contains List of Subjects. here the way
I am using the salience because
if the input us shweta, ARTS, WA,Olympia it matched rule1
but if the input is shweta, ARTS, WA, Seattle it matches 1 and 2 but i
want the rule 2 to be executed so salience.
I am using StatelessKnowledge Session and also the resource change scanner.
I execute one rule at a time and the scanner poll interval is 1 hour.
When I started with 100 rules I was using "PK" as my source in
changeSet.xml but when the rules grew to 20K I was not able to build the
rules in Guvnor UI and hence I started using "DRL" as source.
The way I generate drl is using a script which converts the csv to drl
format.
I copy the drl to the text area in techincal rules and save it. ( this
copy is also paiful so I asked that if there is an upload drl file unlike
the import drl file)
In changeset I give the path to the url in webdav
/guvnor/org.drools.guvnor.Guvnor/webdav/packages/StudentRules/StudentRules.drl
I am not sure if I am doing it the right way. Please suggest.
Thanks,
Shweta
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:58 PM, laune [via Drools] <[hidden
email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3648661&i=0>
> wrote:
> Salience is just one way to force the evaluation of a condition before
> others. In fact, using salience throughout is just a way of re-creating a
> sequence of plain old if statements using a rules engine.
>
> I'm not going to waste my time and yours by elaborating on possible
> alternatives unless you come up with a detailed description of your rules,
> and how you run your rules engine: fact insertion, calls to fire, etc.
>
> -W
>
> 2012/1/10 Shweta1986 <[hidden
email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3647015&i=0>
> >
>
>> I am not sure I understand that. What is the other option for this case.
>> Why would simple rules not work for 20 K rules. Am I missing something. I
>> cannot use database to store my rules. Drools also gives me salience which
>> I need for my usecase.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:29 PM, laune [via Drools] <[hidden
email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3646449&i=0>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> 2012/1/6 Shweta1986 <[hidden
email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3637255&i=0>
>>> >
>>>
>>>> And my rules are very simple it is like if string comparison then set
>>>> that's it..
>>>>
>>> This doesn't really warrant the use of a rule based system. If keeping
>>> this logic out of the application or an easy maintenance of these
if-then's
>>> are your main goals, there are other ways. I've already hinted at this,
>>> with the idea of providing the information embedded in similar rules as
>>> data.
>>> -W
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
<
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3637255&i=1>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>>> discussion below:
>>>
>>>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Large-number-of-rules-in-Drools-tp36303...
>>> To start a new topic under Drools: User forum, email [hidden
email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3646449&i=1>
>>> To unsubscribe from Drools: User forum, click here.
>>>
NAML<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=...
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> View this message in context: Re: [rules-users] Large number of rules
>> in
Drools<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Large-number-of-rules-in-Droo...
>>
>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list
archive<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-User-forum-f47000.htm...
Nabble.com.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
<
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3647015&i=1>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> [hidden email] <
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3647015&i=2>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> ------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> discussion below:
>
>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Large-number-of-rules-in-Drools-tp36303...
> To start a new topic under Drools: User forum, email [hidden
email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3648661&i=1>
> To unsubscribe from Drools: User forum, click here.
>
NAML<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=...
>
------------------------------
View this message in context: Re: [rules-users] Large number of rules in
Drools<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Large-number-of-rules-in-Droo...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list
archive<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-User-forum-f47000.htm...
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users