3:36 a.m.
Thanks Mike!
I'm a total newbie here with Drools, so what I'm going to do is to take your
solution and try it out.
Cheers!
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1(a)ford.com>
wrote:
Thanks Steve,
This fixed the problem!
For Cheng Wei Lee's benefit this is the complete solution (I had to fix
another part):-
public class DBUtils {
public Collection getNumbers() {
Integer[] numbers = new Integer[10];
for (int i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++) {
numbers[i] = (int)Math.random() * 100;
}
return Arrays.asList(numbers);
}
}
rule "a1"
when
$max : Number() from accumulate( Number( $v : intValue ) from
dbutils.getNumbers(), max($v) )
then
System.out.println($max.intValue());
end
With kind regards,
Mike
------------------------------
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Steven Williams
*Sent:* 23 April 2008 09:07
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Re: Is this scenario suitable for using
Drools?
change DBUtils to return a Collection and it should work I think.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1(a)ford.com>
wrote:
> So, in my usual helpful manner I thought Drools would be a perfect
> match and put together what I thought would be a simple example:-
>
> package com.sample
>
> global com.sample.DBUtils dbutils;
> rule "a1"
> when
> $max : Integer() from accumulate( Integer( $v : intValue ) from
> dbutils.getNumbers(), max($v) )
> then
> System.out.println($max);
> end
>
>
> public class DBUtils {
>
> public Integer[] getNumbers() {
>
> Integer[] numbers = new Integer[10];
> for (int i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++) {
> numbers[i] = (int) (Math.random() * 100);
> }
> return numbers;
> }
> }
>
> However this led to some errors:-
>
> org.drools.RuntimeDroolsException: java.lang.ClassCastException:
> [Ljava.lang.Integer; incompatible with java.lang.Integer
> at org.drools.rule.Accumulate.accumulate(Accumulate.java:131)
> at
> org.drools.reteoo.AccumulateNode.assertTuple(AccumulateNode.java:127)
> at
>
org.drools.reteoo.CompositeTupleSinkAdapter.createAndPropagateAssertTuple(CompositeTupleSinkAdapter.java:73)
> at
> org.drools.reteoo.LeftInputAdapterNode.assertObject(LeftInputAdapterNode.java:116)
> at
>
org.drools.reteoo.SingleObjectSinkAdapter.propagateAssertObject(SingleObjectSinkAdapter.java:22)
> at
> org.drools.reteoo.ObjectTypeNode.assertObject(ObjectTypeNode.java:153)
> at org.drools.reteoo.Rete.assertObject(Rete.java:177)
> at
> org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase.assertObject(ReteooRuleBase.java:192)
> at
>
org.drools.reteoo.ReteooWorkingMemory$WorkingMemoryReteAssertAction.execute(ReteooWorkingMemory.java:179)
> at
>
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.executeQueuedActions(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1292)
> at
> org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:891)
> at
> org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:858)
> at
> org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:659)
> at com.sample.DroolsTest.main(DroolsTest.java:36)
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: [Ljava.lang.Integer;
> incompatible with java.lang.Integer
> at
> org.drools.base.java.lang.Integer968047027$intValue.getIntValue(Unknown
> Source)
> at
> org.drools.base.ClassFieldExtractor.getIntValue(ClassFieldExtractor.java:197)
> at org.drools.rule.Declaration.getIntValue(Declaration.java:230)
> at
>
com.sample.Rule_a1_0AccumulateExpression0Invoker.evaluate(Rule_a1_0AccumulateExpression0Invoker.java:16)
> at
>
org.drools.base.accumulators.JavaAccumulatorFunctionExecutor.accumulate(JavaAccumulatorFunctionExecutor.java:74)
> at org.drools.rule.Accumulate.accumulate(Accumulate.java:123)
> ... 13 more
> Have I done something really stupid and is Drools a fit?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Cheng Wei Lee
> *Sent:* 22 April 2008 17:27
> *To:* rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> *Subject:* [rules-users] Re: Is this scenario suitable for using Drools?
>
> I've 2 algorithms to calculate the cost of a product. At any one time,
> there is only 1 algorithm in use. Initially algorithm 1 will be the default.
> Subsequently, the decision to use which algorithm will depend on customers
> feedback. The algorithms are:
>
> Algorithm 1:
> Cost = MAX(P1, T1, P2, T2, P3, T3, ...)
>
> Algorithm 2:
> Cost = MIN(P1, P2, P3, ...) + MIN(T1, T2, T3, ...)
>
> The values of P1, P2, ... are stored within a database. The number of Ps
> & Ts are unknown but can be determined by querying the database, Would
> drools be a good option to use to store the algorithms? If so, how could I
> be able to retrieve the values of P1, P2, etc from the database from within
> drools?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
Steven Williams
Supervising Consultant
Object Consulting
Office: 8615 4500 Mob: 0439 898 668 Fax: 8615 4501
steven.williams(a)objectconsulting.com.au
www.objectconsulting.com.au
consulting | development | training | support
our experience makes the difference
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users