3:58 a.m.
Hi,
I have a requirement to compare attributes in two objects(Object1 Vs. Object2) and store
the values based on business rule in object 3.
Example rules:
If (Obj1.atrr1 != Obj2.atrr1)
Then Obj3.attr1 = Obj2.atrr1
If (Obj1.atrr2 != Obj2.atrr2)
Then Obj3.attr2 = Obj1.atrr2
If (Obj1.atrr3 - Obj2.atrr3 > 10)
Then Obj3.attr3 = Obj1.atrr3
We are planning to use decision table for this to avoid a separate GUI development.
Would like to know whether writing rule for each attribute is the only solution or is
there any simpler approach?
Thanks in advance,
-Bala
________________________________
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary,
or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the
sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is
prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its
affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by
our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance
with Accenture policy. .
______________________________________________________________________________________
www.accenture.com
5:42 a.m.
If you look at the decision table examples in the Drools documentation
you'll see that decision tables don't fit the pattern you have posted.
But you can rules to do what you want, and you'll need one rule for
each comparison if a distinct action is to be performed for each
inequality.
-W
On 18/02/2014, bala.ganesh(a)accenture.com <bala.ganesh(a)accenture.com> wrote:
Hi,
I have a requirement to compare attributes in two objects(Object1 Vs.
Object2) and store the values based on business rule in object 3.
Example rules:
If (Obj1.atrr1 != Obj2.atrr1)
Then Obj3.attr1 = Obj2.atrr1
If (Obj1.atrr2 != Obj2.atrr2)
Then Obj3.attr2 = Obj1.atrr2
If (Obj1.atrr3 - Obj2.atrr3 > 10)
Then Obj3.attr3 = Obj1.atrr3
We are planning to use decision table for this to avoid a separate GUI
development.
Would like to know whether writing rule for each attribute is the only
solution or is there any simpler approach?
Thanks in advance,
-Bala
________________________________
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by
local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates,
including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned
by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of
internal compliance with Accenture policy. .
______________________________________________________________________________________
www.accenture.com
6:03 a.m.
Thanks Wolfgang. This really clarifies my doubt
-Bala
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 5:13 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Attribute comparison thru decision table
If you look at the decision table examples in the Drools documentation you'll see that
decision tables don't fit the pattern you have posted.
But you can rules to do what you want, and you'll need one rule for each comparison if
a distinct action is to be performed for each inequality.
-W
On 18/02/2014, bala.ganesh(a)accenture.com <bala.ganesh(a)accenture.com> wrote:
Hi,
I have a requirement to compare attributes in two objects(Object1 Vs.
Object2) and store the values based on business rule in object 3.
Example rules:
If (Obj1.atrr1 != Obj2.atrr1)
Then Obj3.attr1 = Obj2.atrr1
If (Obj1.atrr2 != Obj2.atrr2)
Then Obj3.attr2 = Obj1.atrr2
If (Obj1.atrr3 - Obj2.atrr3 > 10)
Then Obj3.attr3 = Obj1.atrr3
We are planning to use decision table for this to avoid a separate GUI
development.
Would like to know whether writing rule for each attribute is the only
solution or is there any simpler approach?
Thanks in advance,
-Bala
________________________________
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you
have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited.
Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture
and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including
content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of
information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy. .
______________________________________________________________________
________________
www.accenture.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
________________________________
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary,
or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the
sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is
prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its
affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by
our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance
with Accenture policy. .
______________________________________________________________________________________
www.accenture.com
3934
days inactive
3934
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
bala.ganesh＠accenture.com -
Wolfgang Laun