On 26/05/2011 10:10, Marco Piraccini wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm wondering about the use of drools with "portable" rules definition.
The fact is that the Drools rules definition is not portable (true?).
But the "knowledge", of course, should be portable.
For instance it should be great to have SWRL support (I see that
there's a very old mailing list thread about that, but not so useful),
or at least some tools to translate DRL to SWRL.
Anyone has some idea/experience about that topic?
You can be portable if you do a
small subset, drools supports features
beyond things like SWRL or SPARQL.
Mark
Marco.