Guvnor test scenarios public no-arg constructor - rules-users - Jboss List Archives

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

Guvnor test scenarios public no-arg constructor

5.2CR1

Re: [rules-users] drools-server

Lisa Horton

Thursday, 19 May 2011 Thu, 19 May '11

6:06 p.m.

It appears that in order to be used in a Guvnor test scenario, an class must have a public no-argument constructor. Is this true? And if so, is there a workaround for classes that have a private constructor (other than changing the object model)?

Attachments:

attachment.html (text/html — 2.3 KB)

Reply

Show replies by date

Nicolas Héron

Friday, 20 May Fri, 20 May

1:59 a.m.

Hello, yes this is true, you need a no-argument constructor (like most moderm framework). You can use AspectJ <http://www.eclipse.org/aspect> or Spring<http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/2.0.x/reference/aop.... dynamically add a no-argument constructor. Regards Nicolas 2011/5/20 Lisa Horton <LHorton(a)abclegal.com>:

It appears that in order to be used in a Guvnor test scenario, an class

must

have a public no-argument constructor. Is this true? And if so, is there

a

workaround for classes that have a private constructor (other than

changing

the object model)? _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Reply

lhorton

1:35 p.m.

These classes already have private no-arg constructors. As far as I know, Spring method injection/replacement won't work when there is an existing private method. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Guvnor-test-scenarios-publi... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply

4939

days inactive

4940

days old

rules-users@lists.jboss.org

Manage subscription

2 comments

3 participants

tags (0)

participants (3)

lhorton
Lisa Horton
Nicolas Héron