Wolfgang Laun-2 wrote:
After reading this description, I don't see any reason for using
auto-focus
in the rule you have presented in the original email; especially the
combination with setFocus() in the RHS looks rather kinky to me.
I stole this reasoning from an old post I read somewhere...
Do you really mean that the final state after group2 is expected to
be
"*in*consistent"
w.r.t. the checks in group1?
I really do mean it. But you have a point, it's weird. I've got some
ideas
to refine the checks so that they would always be valid. In that case, I
won't need the groups anymore :) But first I'll have to see if I get there.
Anyway, I would use a rule in MAIN to give the focus to group1 and then to
group2 and avoid auto-focus and any "control logic" in the
rules of either
group.
Good idea. Thanks!
Evert
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Clearing-an-AgendaGro...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.