10:14 a.m.
The documentation on the 'and' Conditional Element seems to imply that these
constructs are equivalent:
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (and
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
and eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
Actually, the first version crashes with this message:
unknown:93:7 Unexpected token 'and'[96,2]: unknown:96:2 mismatched token:
[@792,3685:3685=')',<12>,96:2]; expecting type THEN
I'm on drools 4.0.2 and mvel14-1.2.8.
Alexandre
12:28 p.m.
This is a bug. May I ask you please to open a JIRA for it?
Thanks
Edson
2008/1/15, Gattiker, Alexandre <Alexandre.Gattiker(a)generali.ch>:
The documentation on the 'and' Conditional Element seems to imply that
these constructs are equivalent:
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (and
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
and eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
Actually, the first version crashes with this message:
unknown:93:7 Unexpected token 'and'[96,2]: unknown:96:2 mismatched token:
[@792,3685:3685=')',<12>,96:2]; expecting type THEN
I'm on drools 4.0.2 and mvel14-1.2.8.
Alexandre
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
12:40 p.m.
Actually, I just understood the problem.
The "not" CE requires () when used with anything that is not a simple
pattern. So the following are valid constructions:
not A()
not( A() and B() )
Now, if you want to use a prefixed "and"/"or", it also requires a
(). So
the following is a valid construction:
not( (and A() B() ) )
So, the proposed construction is not valid for current grammar, because
it is missing one pair of ():
not( and A() B() ) // WRONG
Now, I do think it would be desirable for us to support the above
construction, so if you open a ticket for that I will look into enabling it.
[]s
Edson
2008/1/15, Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com>:
This is a bug. May I ask you please to open a JIRA for it?
Thanks
Edson
2008/1/15, Gattiker, Alexandre < Alexandre.Gattiker(a)generali.ch>:
>
> The documentation on the 'and' Conditional Element seems to imply that
> these constructs are equivalent:
>
> $p1:Entity($code1:code)
> not (and
> $p2:Entity(code == $code1)
> eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
> )
>
> $p1:Entity($code1:code)
> not (
> $p2:Entity(code == $code1)
> and eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
> )
>
> Actually, the first version crashes with this message:
>
> unknown:93:7 Unexpected token 'and'[96,2]: unknown:96:2 mismatched
> token: [@792,3685:3685=')',<12>,96:2]; expecting type THEN
>
> I'm on drools 4.0.2 and mvel14-1.2.8.
>
> Alexandre
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
6167
days inactive
6167
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Edson Tirelli -
Gattiker, Alexandre