Hi, I've built a RuleBase comprised of 2 ruleflows and their respective rules. Each ruleflow is defined in a separate package however both use a common set of ruleflow-group names. It looks something like this: Ruleflows: Flow 1, Flow 2 Flow 1 package: com.test.flow1 Flow 1 ruleflow groups: Group A, Group B, Group C Flow 2 package: com.test.flow2 Flow 2 ruleflow groups: Group A, Group B, Group C When I load both packages into a RuleBase and insert an Object, I see that rules in both Flow 1 and Flow 2 are executed, even though only ruleflow process "Flow 1" was started. In short, it appears that Drools does not take a rule's package into consideration when executing a ruleflow. Is this expected behavior? My understanding was that the rules in Flow 2 should not be executed because they are in a different package. I welcome any input. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Using-multiple-RuleFlows-with-similar-group-names-t... Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.