5:45 p.m.
Hi all,
When trying to rectify the issue mentioned here
(http://n3.nabble.com/Resuming-a-simple-process-involving-human-task-td716...),
I stumbled upon a completely new issue wherein a persisted process is *not*
resumed if the process flow contains a rule flow group. E.g. with a flow
like:
Start -> Rule group -> Human Task -> Print Node -> Finish (doesn't
resume)
Start -> Human Task -> Print Node -> Finish (resumes fine)
Is this a known issue? Can anyone *please* confirm this? TIA.
Peace,
/T\
-----
Arguing on the internet is like running at the special Olympics. Even if you
win, you're still retarded.
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Problems-resuming-a-process-having-rule-groups-tp732...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
6:16 p.m.
Can you please clarify us what exactly get when you try to resume it?
do you have an error or something?
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Touma <database666(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
When trying to rectify the issue mentioned here
(
http://n3.nabble.com/Resuming-a-simple-process-involving-human-task-td716...
),
I stumbled upon a completely new issue wherein a persisted process is *not*
resumed if the process flow contains a rule flow group. E.g. with a flow
like:
Start -> Rule group -> Human Task -> Print Node -> Finish (doesn't
resume)
Start -> Human Task -> Print Node -> Finish (resumes fine)
Is this a known issue? Can anyone *please* confirm this? TIA.
Peace,
/T\
-----
Arguing on the internet is like running at the special Olympics. Even if
you
win, you're still retarded.
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Problems-resuming-a-process-having-rule-groups-tp732...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
3:51 a.m.
salaboy wrote:
Can you please clarify us what exactly get when you try to resume it?
do you have an error or something?
Yes, definitely.
When I try to resume a drools flow having a ruleflow group:
- there is no error/stack-trace
- invoking the completeWorkItem() method *removes* the work item in
consideration from the database table
- Flow is not resumed as it should be
I'm pretty sure this is easily re-producible. If you have a working example
of drools flow having human task, just try to add a rule-flow group to it
and then see whether it resumes or not.
Apologies if this still isn't clear. Let me know which more details you
require and I'd be more than happy to furnish them here. TIA.
Peace,
/T\
-----
Arguing on the internet is like running at the special Olympics. Even if you
win, you're still retarded.
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Problems-resuming-a-process-having-rule-groups-tp732...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
5141
days inactive
5142
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Mauricio Salatino -
Touma