Re: [rules-users] Problems resuming a process having rule groups

salaboy wrote: Yes, definitely. When I try to resume a drools flow having a ruleflow group: - there is no error/stack-trace - invoking the completeWorkItem() method *removes* the work item in consideration from the database table - Flow is not resumed as it should be I'm pretty sure this is easily re-producible. If you have a working example of drools flow having human task, just try to add a rule-flow group to it and then see whether it resumes or not. Apologies if this still isn't clear. Let me know which more details you require and I'd be more than happy to furnish them here. TIA. Peace, /T\ ----- Arguing on the internet is like running at the special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded. -- View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Problems-resuming-a-process-having-rule-groups-tp732... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.