[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBSEAM-975) constraint by inclusion on remote calls object fields
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-975?page=comments#action_12396579 ]
Christophe Vigouroux commented on JBSEAM-975:
---------------------------------------------
We just have the same need. We do not want to exclude certain fields, but we want to
include juste those fields we need.
constraint by inclusion on remote calls object fields
-----------------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-975
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-975
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Remoting
Reporter: Zalder R
Assigned To: Shane Bryzak
Priority: Optional
I think it could be nice to define the fields of the objects returned in a
"WebRemote call" with an "include" parameter (instead of the current
exclude parameter).
For instance :
now you have :
@WebRemote(exclude = {"secret"})
it would be nice to be able to define :
@WebRemote(include = {"fieldIreallyNeed1", "fieldIreallyNeed2"})
The reasons for this are many :
- security : if the object structure varies over time, you would not want the new fields
to be available on the client side by default
- in some cases it's a lot more lightweight (both in the code and in the volume of
data sent) to define a minimum set of fields you want instead of the fields you don't
want
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira