[seam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (SEAMCATCH-31) change terminology for exception type hierarchy traversal

change terminology for exception type hierarchy traversal --------------------------------------------------------- Key: SEAMCATCH-31 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMCATCH-31 Project: Seam Catch Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Core API Affects Versions: 3.0.0.Alpha2 Reporter: Dan Allen Assignee: Jason Porter Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha4 There appears to be some confusion about what the traversal path means. We've come up with some better terms that should help users understand how to use it. When one of the exceptions in the stack trace is being handled, the handlers for that exception are notified in a particular order. That order is based on the type hierarchy of the exception. The traversal seeks to address this scenario: Assume that a group of exceptions have a common super class. You may choose to write a handler that catches all of those exceptions by handling that super type. We'll call that a category handler, where the super class represents a category (i.e., SQLException) So the question you have to ask yourself, then, is: Do you want your category handler to be notified before or after the handler for the subtype gets notified? You specify you want the category handler to be notified before by adding the attribute during = TraversalPath.DESCENDING to the @Handles exception. However, this descending/ascending isn't catching on. Tree traversal is more commonly referred to using the terms breadth-first or depth-first. Catch notifies breadth-first handlers before depth-first handlers, in the order of the tree traversal (walking the exception type hierarchy). Therefore, these attribute values would make more sense: during = TraversalMode.BREADTH_FIRST during = TraversalMode.DEPTH_FIRST (default) If you write a SQLException handler with during = TraversalMode.BREADTH_FIRST, then it will be notified before a handler for BatchUpdateException.