That is fine from my point of view.
This means that:
1) aerogear-parent 0.2.0 is broken until aerogear-misc 0.1.2 is released on
Central (it uses 0.1.2)
2) after aerogear-misc 0.2.0 is eventually removed from Central, we could
remove also the corresponding tag 0.2.0 from upstream repo
Thanks
Andrea
Matthias Wessendorf-2 wrote
Hi,
Andrea reported that the 0.1.2 release (see [1]) contains the wrong
version
number (0.2.0).
This artifact was already pushed to maven central.
On IRC we had the following idea:
* update master to 0.1.2-SNAPSHOT
* perform the release again (that hopefully will result in 0.1.2 on maven
central)
That still means we have a 0.2.0 on maven central. I will ask my contacts
at Sonatype to remove the 0.2.0 bits;
If folks are OK w/ that, I am happy to perform these steps by Monday
morning
Greetings,
Matthias
[1]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-misc/blob/0.1.2/pom.xml
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@.jboss
--
View this message in context:
http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-aerogear-misc-rele...
Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.