Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS: Console - Visibility issues

I would vote to have them along with the other variant details that are already shown (like google's project number etc ...) On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Andres Galante <agalante(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> Hi Matthias and Lukas, >> >> During the user research time I've learn that there are almost none use >> case where the user uses this information stand alone. The user would just >> copy and paste the code snippet. >> > > well, that does not always work (e.g. sligthly different structure of > code). > Even our own Android HelloWorld Demo is not able to use the snippets and > paste them in (due to different code structure - which is good). > > Having them visible give a bit more appreciation to these IDs (or call em > API keys), so it's easy to get the desired info quickly > > > > >> >> We use it a lot because we test it and set it up a bunch of times UPS. >> We already have the code set up and we end up knowing where to look for the >> data. Luke bring this same issue to me during Summit. >> >> Let me think of a good way to highlight that information to make the >> expert user life easier. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas(a)fryc.eu&gt; wrote: >> >>> Basically it is something that we "agreed on" (or rather didn't catch) >>> during mockup reviews and that never changed from that time. >>> >>> @Andres: did it have some reason to hide the details? >>> >>> I'm all for exposing it more visibly. >>> >>> st 24. 6. 2015 v 17:21 odesílatel Matthias Wessendorf < >>> matzew(a)apache.org&gt; napsal: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> on our old design the PushApplicationID/MasterSecret was very good to >>>> notice: >>>> >>>> https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide//img/applications_var... >>>> >>>> Now it's a bit more hidden (one has to click on the "Sender API" tab >>>> of the Application). >>>> >>>> Similar w/ the VariantID/Secret pair, IMO it is also a bit hidden, >>>> since this is only visible in the source snippets for the variant. >>>> >>>> They used to be a bit more present: >>>> >>>> https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide//img/applications_var... >>>> >>>> Since I find that suboptimal, I am wondering if that's done for a good >>>> reason, or if something (in a future version?) should be changed ? >>>> >>>> -M >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev