Re: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear Messaging

On Apr 21, 2015, at 10:50 AM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Burr Sutter <bsutter(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > We already have ActiveMQ, a message broker that will deal with things like > “durable subscriptions”, holding messages until the subscriber wakes up and > acknowledges receipt. > > There is also Mosca as a Node.js-based MQTT focused message broker. > > There will be a wide spectrum of Things - from most distributed edge > sensors with energy harvesting (smart dust) to robust “gateway” servers > that look a lot like your typical datacenter server today. It is currently > unclear to me which of the application protocols will “win”. At this > moment, MQTT is a winner (great support from numerous vendors) and I feel > that CoAP will be a winner as well. > AMQP or DDS may win on the beefier gateways but not so much edge > intelligent things. MQTT seems to work pretty OK on Android (last I checked). What type of messaging APIs would be useful on mobile hosts? I I am not sure…lots of folks here to provide some insights :-) Does an IOT webapp even make sense? (There is probably something to be said for ChromeOS apps) If the Thing is beefy enough to run a web browser then I consider it to be a mobile use case, less an IoT use case scenario. > > > > On Apr 21, 2015, at 10:22 AM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > wrote: >> >> more something like a unified messanger platform, where we have real >> messaging hooks/adapters (client/server) for protocols like AMQP, MQTT, XMPP >> etc while having support for push notifications as well. > > We could probably extend the Push API. I mean it already does half the > work for us ;) >> >> >> That would be nice to have, at some point >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >>> >>> like Notifier? >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> So IoT is getting a lot of attention within the company (or at least >>>> within my monkeysphere). From the demo project I've noticed that a lot of >>>> the work is in messaging and message handling. What do you guys think about >>>> exploring this space more? How does it / can it /should it fit into our >>>> roadmap? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev