Re: [aerogear-dev] JIRA instances for Push...
this sounds reasonable.
Would we go back and rename previous AGPUSH releases to ups-* and also recreate the
current old sps releases in AGPUSH?
On Jan 5, 2015, at 6:53 AM, Bruno Oliveira
<bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
I think makes sense having all of them under AGPUSH and creating
components: ups, sps and wps and manage it with the release field.
+1
On 2015-01-05, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> right now we have three different types of 'push servers':
> * UPS
> * SimplePush
> * WebPush Server
>
> The first two ones each have their own JIRA, but I was wondering if we use
> the AGPUSH jira for all three.
>
> To manage releases and bugs, we will go with different/more components, and
> for the releases, we could do what we do successfully on our Cordova
> project. We can, in JIRA, have releases like:
>
> ups-1.3.0
> sps-1.0.0
> wps-0.2.0
>
> That way would have all push (server) bits on the same JIRA and
> differentiation is simply done using components and versions as discussed
> above.
>
> Any thoughts ?
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev