it is still very rough
On Aug 27, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
+1 keep it simple, please
Lucas Holmquist wrote:
>
> On Aug 27, 2013, at 3:39 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:scm.blanc@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> That sounds good !
>> Just one question, instead of using the callApi function couldn't we
>> pass the oauth module (called 'thing' in your example) to the pipe
>> directly, using the 'authenticator' setting. Behind the scene, the
>> pipe manager will append the oauth token to the query or add the
>> bearer header ?
>
> I'm not sure if that is what this is going to do. This is more of an
> Authorization thing and i don't think it totally fits the pipeline
> stuff. ( or it would make it a bit more complicated, and we want to keep
> it simple )
>
>
> i should probably change the method to be "authorize" instead
>
>> Seb
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com
>> <mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> OAuth2 AeroGear Workflow - High Level
>>
>>
>> Using Google api's
>>
>> /Server Side/
>>
>> 1. user needs to first create an "application/project" to get an
>> api key
>> 2. Then they would choose the services/api's then would like
>> there application to access
>> 3. other google server related items....
>>
>> /Client Side/
>>
>> 1. Create a new OAuth2 module thing
>> 2. Get access token for the services would need to specify the
>> services they would like to access
>> 3. validate the token
>> 4. make calls to the service
>>
>>
>> API
>>
>> |var thing = AerGear.OAuth2({
>> name: googleEndPoints, //Just a Name
>> clientID: "12345" //The client ID of the app from
the API console
>> settings: {
>> permissions: "..",
>> ...
>> }
>> }).somecoolmodulename.googleEndPoints;
>> |
>>
>> /Settings: Multiple settings based on paramters here
>> <
https://developers.google.com/accounts/docs/OAuth2UserAgent>/
>>
>> /Methods/
>>
>>
>> authenticate
>>
>> this will authenticate with the server to get the access token and
>> then validate the token, once that is all good then the response
>> is returned.
>>
>> |thing.authenticate({
>> success:{},
>> error:{},
>> settings: {
>> //probably some settings here, like URL overides and such
>> }
>> });
>> |
>>
>>
>> callApi
>>
>> not really a good name, but it would basically call the remote
>> api/services. we could either do a query string option or a Head
>> option
>>
>> example:
>>
>> |curl
'https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v1/userinfo?access_token=1/fFBGRNJru1FQd44AzqT3Zg'
>> |
>>
>> or
>>
>> |curl -H "Authorization: Bearer {accessToken}"
https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v1/userinfo
>> |
>>
>> code:
>>
>> |thing.callApi({
>> service: "userinfo", //don't really like this name either
>> success:{},
>> error:{},
>> settings: {
>> ... //overridable baseURLs?
>> }
>> });
>> |
>>
>>
>> revoke
>>
>> again, maybe not the best name. calls the "revoke" service, to
>> remove access to permissions
>>
>> |thing.revoke({
>> success: {},
>> error: {},
>> settings: {}
>> });
>> |
>>
>> Behind the scenes on all these calls, the "access_token" is
>> beining used and possibly refreshed for the user, so they don't
>> have to worry about it. They just need to call authenticate first.
>> Maybe we can have a refresh method if the user wants to refresh
>> the tokens themselves. this would do the token "dance"
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 26, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org
>> <mailto:bruno@abstractj.org>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 I think is a good start to us.
>>>
>>> Kris Borchers wrote:
>>>> I would like to see that but what you are saying makes sense. It
>>>> sounds like where I was headed with the Basic and Digest
>>>> adapters before I ran into browser security issues with headers.
>>>> I think and authorization API that basically just wraps itself
>>>> around secured endpoints works for me.
>>>
>>> --
>>> abstractj
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
abstractj
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev