Re: [aerogear-dev] Pipe Builder

Agreed with matzew and some suggestions. Try to enforce the chain if the **order** of the method call matters to you, returning 'this' user could call: Pipe<Bar> barPipe = pipeline.newPipe() .withName("bar") .useClass(Bar.class) .withType(REST) .withEnpoint("my-crazy-endpoing") .build(); Or Pipe<Bar> barPipe = pipeline.newPipe() .useClass(Bar.class) .withEnpoint("my-crazy-endpoing") .withName("bar") .withType(REST) .build(); -- "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato - @abstractj - Volenti Nihil Difficile On Monday, October 29, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Look great! minor things: * newPipe() ==> pipe(); * withFoo(arg) ==> foo(arg); -M On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Daniel Passos <daniel(a)passos.me&gt; wrote: Hey Guys, What do you think about draft of Pipe Builder? => https://gist.github.com/3973193 -- Daniel Passos _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev