Re: [aerogear-dev] Staging of UPS 1.1.0-beta.2

Hi Stefan, thanks for the tests! On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Stefan Miklosovic <smikloso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Hi, > > I am mostly tracking what Tadeas found for Beta1 release. > > 1. While sending push notification from the browser, there is "No > variants" in variant selection by default. When I do not select any > variant, the message is sent to all variants. It should be renamed to > "All variants" instead "No variants" or it should be said that when > nothing is chosen, by default it will be sent everywhere. > I have created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1449

> 2. For some reason there is a lot of space in the bottom and I can > scroll away all the content - minor issue. > Not sure I understand; bottom of where (and what browser)? Mind filing a JIRA for this ?

> Bugs: > > 1. After adding variant for simple push in the wizard, all links on > that variant page are dead - they do not do anything. >

Hrm, worked for me (Chrome, incognito window). What browser did you use ? > > UI/UX Quirks > > 4. This is not changed in beta 2 and I agree with Tadeas about it - > When hitting the Edit variant button, it shows a dialog where I can > change only the name of the variant. However when I click the Change > network options button, I am presented with the possibility to change > both the name of the variant and the network specific configuration. I > would therefore suggest to not show the name field in the Change > network options dialog as it is not considered a good practise to have > two ways of doing the same thing in UI. >

I have created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1448 > I tried helloworld quickstart on Android tablet, pushes arrived > without problems, I reinstalled my notebook few days ago so you can > imagine that the bootstraping of all development tools and compilation > of all libs was not so straighforward however I have to say that it > was overall smooth experience and I did it at the first shot. > thanks, glad to hear. And yes, the tricky part is the 3rd party setup :-) > > Admin UI is very nice and responsive as well and I like it as Tadeas > does. Whoever made the decision to migrate to new visual look&feel did > a good job. I excersised UI quite a lot and I do not encounter any > usability nor performance issue. > Andres drove the initiative w/ help from Lukas and? > > I am overall satisfied with this release and I do not raise any > significant objections which would prevent the release of 1.1.0-beta.2 > of UPS. > awesome, will click the button > > I would like to see the release of UPS Java client 1.0.0.Beta2 as > well. Right now there is not any beta2-aligned sender to UPS > 1.1.0-beta.2. Beta1 sender is using unifiedpush-push-model of version > 1.0.0-alpha2 so I expect that Java client will use parent 0.2.15 and > all bits will be aligned properly. > fair point! This needs (and will be) to be fixed in Final. Thanks again for the detailed report! -Matthias > > Regards > > Stefan > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org > > > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Stefan from our QE ask if we can delay the release to tomorrow, > >> test have been updated to beta.2 but he wants to web console and run > some > >> demos. > >> > >> IMO this is fine > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org > > > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi team, > >>> > >>> here is the second beta release for the UPS 1.1.0. It contains more > >>> features and improvements around UI, Keycloak_1.2.0 (w/ enabled direct > >>> access grant) and a lot of other stuff: > >>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH/fixforversion/12326578 > >>> > >>> Please test the staged release: > >>> > >>> > https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jboss_releases_st... > >>> > >>> Like w/ the previous beta, please make sure you use a full profile > >>> WildFly or EAP server for tests, since we now have JMS hooks ;-) > >>> (See README for details) > >>> > >>> On Wednesday I'd like to press the button to release it to the wild. > >>> > >>> PS: For this beta release we won't yet be updating our Openshift > >>> cartridge - that will stay on 1.0.3 (stable) for a little longer > time. For > >>> the next FINAL release in a few weeks we will get to this Openshift > as well. > >>> > >>> -Matthias > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Matthias Wessendorf > >>> > >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Matthias Wessendorf > >> > >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> aerogear-dev mailing list > >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > -- > Stefan Miklosovic > Red Hat Brno - JBoss Mobile Platform > > e-mail: smikloso(a)redhat.com > irc: smikloso > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev