Re: [aerogear-dev] Aerogear Website design

Ahoy my friend, answers inline. (my personal opinion) On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Andres Galante <agalante(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: I think both. We have JavaScript, iOS, Android, Cordova, Firefox and JavaEE developers. For example, some Java EE developers don't care about JS and they might be looking for a ready made solution (In this situation, AeroGear with Forge or JBDS is a good fit). At the same time you have JS developers for example like Lukas or Luke, which are familiar with Java EE, but they are more like a hardcore developer and they just want to make use of libraries. Some devs will stick make use of tools, others to just our libraries. At the moment, I would say that Push is the main AeroGear focus. Although AG is more than just Push. We provide libraries willing to make developer's life easy so topics like: Push, Security (cryptography, OAuth2 libraries, 2 factor), data sync, geo-fencing, offline support...and more crazy and dirty things you could possible imagine with fancy devices — probably AG will be there. Most of the developers (others can correct me if I'm wrong) are looking to boost their productivity. Let's think about something very complex like cryptography or OAuth2, is really hard to newcomers to grok into RFCs and implement it. Most part of the time people just want to connect their apps to Facebook, Twitter, <put your favorite social network here>. People don't have time and sometimes patience to read RFCs and start from scratch (because it's boring) I think this is where AeroGear comes into place. If you talk to Passos, he will give to you details about reducing 25% of the hard work on Android with AeroGear. Amazing. Not sure if AeroGear would be a person, but to me is more like Skipper ( http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130327234948/pixar/images/7/70/Plane... ) -- -- "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato - @abstractj - Volenti Nihil Difficile