At the moment 0 concerns, so +1
Yes, for doing tests before the change.
On 2015-05-14, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
our aerogear-parent uses an older jbosss-parent #11. This version uses some
older libraries/plugins. For instance the checkstyle version in there is
not understanding java8.
We have done some work arounds, like:
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-webpush-server/blob/master/pom.xml#L275
Why not going to a newer jboss parent instead, e.g. 17 ?
Sure - this needs some tests :-) but I was wondering if there is a general
concern
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914