Yup, was necessary to adapt our implementation to keep it compatible with google
authenticator, in the future it will be replaced and we can remove some specific needs
from Google.
Feel free to file Jiras
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR and assign to me, if you
find some issue.
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Daniel Manzke wrote:
Hey guys,
after talking about the RFCs and so, I couldn't stop to read them. ;)
There I stumbled about the test vectors. They are not working with the
aerogear-implementation, because of the Base32 encoding which is used by the google
authenticator.
The used secret in the rfc is "1234567890", which is not valid google, because
Base32 uses ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ234567.
vectors:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6238#appendix-B
Using the "reference implementation", which is provided in document the
generated token is different from aerogear one.
Is the plan to support the RFC or Google? (or better both? :)) --
Viele Grüße/Best Regards
Daniel Manzke
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org)
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev