On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Sébastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I wonder if a bar chart (even maybe stacked bar) would not be more
clear
to show this data ?
Wdyt ?
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 8 avr. 2015 à 15:44, Andres Galante <agalante(a)redhat.com> a écrit :
Yes, you are right, it should be something like:
5 message sent
3k delivered
2k open
4k devices.
Just change the example. Also the x-axis should be dates.
Thanks!
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
> One thing: I think the numbers on the chart are confusing, and incorrect.
> It's usually not a ton of messages that are sent. that's more like 5 or
> 10 per day (speaking of vanilla marketing pushes). If more, I'd UNINSTALL
> the damn app.
> Therefore the "app opened due to receiving push" numbers are also not
> 100% correct here.
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> :-) I like that too.
>>
>> But Andres, again, awesome UX !
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc(a)gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks good so far, Andres,
>>>>
>>>> you are right, we want to show time-aggregated data, not particular
>>>> events.
>>>>
>>>> Idea:
>>>> My perspective might be very technical rather then marketing, but a
>>>> pie chart with Push Network split would be interesting to me.
>>>>
>>> +1 (or Donut :) )
>>>
>>>>
>>>> st 8. 4. 2015 v 14:12 odesílatel Andres Galante
<agalante(a)redhat.com>
>>>> napsal:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> With the new data we have I've compared sent vs open messages on
a
>>>>> chart for each App:
>>>>>
https://rawgit.com/andresgalante/UPS/master/app-detail-analytics.html
>>>>> (the x axis should be dates)
>>>>>
>>>>> I am wondering if we can generate a ratio that's useful for a
>>>>> marketing person and show a benchmark comparing with other UPS users
to
>>>>> know if the users campaign is successful or not. Something like:
open/sent
>>>>> or device/open
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe that to show the first and last time a message was open is
>>>>> not very useful. Maybe I am wrong, but, If we want to show an over
time
>>>>> chart for each notification we should collect periodical data, for
example
>>>>> # of open messages per hour to generate a linear graph that
represents a
>>>>> day.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Sébastien Blanc
<scm.blanc(a)gmail.com
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Envoyé de mon iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 30 mars 2015 à 21:31, Daniel Passos <dpassos(a)redhat.com>
a
>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Sebastien Blanc <
>>>>>> scm.blanc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Folks !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For AGPUSH-969[1] and to kick off the discussions, I started
a
>>>>>>> small POC mainly focused on the backend. To sum up quickly :
we want to
>>>>>>> know how many installations/users has opened the application
after that a
>>>>>>> Push Notification has been touched.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me see if I understood. UPS will send a message to the
client
>>>>>> and when the message be *read* (instead of delivered), the client
will send
>>>>>> a message back to the UPS saying: "The message was
read"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes , but let me be more specific here : us when the app is in
the
>>>>>> background or not running and that the user "tap" the
notification
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, the very first thing that had to be done was to give the
Push
>>>>>>> Notification a unique identifier, so that we can track it and
do the
>>>>>>> metrics on it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1. Not only us (UPS) but also the backend app
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For that, I have been using an existing model object that we
have ,
>>>>>>> the PushMessageInformation[2], and that is currently used to
provide
>>>>>>> information for our dashboard.
>>>>>>> This object has now some extra fields, like a appOpenCounter
etc
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The ID of this PushMessageInformation is now passed into the
>>>>>>> payload of the Push Message, just before we send it, this
way the client
>>>>>>> library can use this ID to pass extra information to the UPS
when a
>>>>>>> notification is touched.
>>>>>>> For this POC, I hijacked the cordova-helloworld, so that it
>>>>>>> extracts the ID from the payload and pass it as header when
registering.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The message back (from client to UPS) will be send every time
the
>>>>>> user _read_ that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well normally that will only happen once per installation per
Push
>>>>>> message
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When the UPS receive the request, it looks for the header and
if it
>>>>>>> exist it updates the existing PushMessageInformation
instance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please note, that for this POC, all is happening on
Application
>>>>>>> level and not on Variant level but that can be easily
changed. It depends
>>>>>>> on how fined grained we want to have these analytics.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did a small screencast that shows this in action :
>>>>>>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PseBBJZLz6s&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The UPS branch containing the changes is here (the 2 latests
>>>>>>> commits are relevant) :
>>>>>>>
https://github.com/sebastienblanc/aerogear-unified-push-server/tree/analy...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The client app is not really relevant since I really hacked
badly
>>>>>>> the app (and the push plugin) ;) , however if interested I
may share it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, let's discuss :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sebi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-969
>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/model...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> -- Passos
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev