Just as a note, 1,2,3,5 are the ones we want to remove. 4 is the
cook book
and should stay :)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
> +1 let's remove all of them!
>
> I am happy to do so, once we get agreement on this subject :-)
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> We've moved all our example apps[1], [2], [3] for the cookbook[4] and
>> also split the old integration test project[5] into your respective
>> modules. Should we remove the old repos? Wdyt?
>>
>> [1]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-aerodoc-android
>> [2]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-otp-android-demo
>> [3]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-crypto-android-demo
>> [4]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android-cookbook
>> [5]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android-integration-tests
>>
>> --
>> -- Passos
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev