Re: [aerogear-dev] Proposal to change the Java Sender Builder API
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 08:51:55AM +0100, Corinne Krych wrote:
+1 too
also I like the idea of dropping "Java" in JavaSender for a more
descriptive PushSender or PushAppSender to get the information this sender
is linked to an Push app
That's a nice idea! +1
++
Corinne
On 10 November 2014 08:31, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> +1 I like the static methods for creating the builder
> Also makes perfect sense to make the applicationId and masterSecret part
> of the sender.
>
>
> PushSender client = DefaultPushSender.withRootServerURL("
> http://aerogear.example.com/ag-push")
> .proxy("proxy", 8080)
> .proxyType(Proxy.Type.HTTP)
> .build();
> PushSender client =
>
DefaultPushSender.withConfig("/path/on/classpath/push-config.json").build();
> PushSender client = DefaultPushSender.withConfig(inputstream).build();
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
qmx