+1 Less maintenance sounds good to me.
On 22 July 2014 11:00, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All !
>>
>> I'm currently working on APGUSH-810[1] which consist in removing the
>> dependency we still had on the deprecated aerogear-security project (RIP my
>> friend).
>>
>> But now, if I want to keep AeroDoc, feature equal as before, I have to
>> add a LOT of code around security (to handle role, annotations etc ...).
>> AeroDoc is already quite complex and time consuming to maintain and the
>> core scope is not security but advanced Push.
>>
>> So ... What I would like to propose is to keep only the authentification
>> (log in) and remove all the role handling part to simplify it.
>>
>> The only effect that this will introduce, is that a logged in user can
>> also access the admin to create leads.
>>
>
> that is fine w/ me
>
>>
>>
>> Wdyt ?
>>
>> Sebi
>>
>>
>> [1]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-810
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev