I believe the UI was in its own repo during the first iteration(when it was
ember :))
If we want to attract contributors from the JS community, then making it a
WAR is not really a great idea,
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
separate repo, not sure
separate WAR file, I think at some point I want to have a bunch of
different WAR files:
* sender_API.war
* registration_API.war
* ui.war
core.jar (EJB w/ the messaging, as core)
but, that's a bit in the future... we have some Swarm related JIRAs for
that
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Leonardo Rossetti <lrossett(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Currently we have the UPS admin UI embedded into
> aerogear-unifiedpush-server project/repository.
>
> Could the admin-ui be a separated project (repository) with its own war
> file?
>
> While it may increase release process complexity (a new project
> dependency), I think it brings some benefits to the table, such as having a
> development cycle of this own, easier to write automated tests and easier
> to attract contributors from the javascript community (since we would be
> using common javascript tools to build it).
>
> WDYT?
>
> --
> Leonardo Rossetti
> lrossett(a)redhat.com
> +55 11 99703 0621 <+55%2011%2099703-0621>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev