6:21 a.m.
So I started to look more closely to this, and I'm wondering how we want
the Callback to be. I see 2 options that are described here :
https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/7023151
Basically, version 1 has a 'completed' method which will be invoked no
matter which http status code is returned, the developer has than to
implement it's own logic of handling the status. The 'failure' method will
be invoked in case of an exception is thrown (IOException for instance)
Version 2 has a 'onSuccess' method which handles the 2xx response codes and
a 'onError' which handles 4xx, 5xx codes or even if an exception
has occurred.
Do you have any preference or even an alternative solution ?
Seb
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
FYI Karel has created a Jira for this
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-373
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:13:52 -0400
> Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 09/18/2013 09:37 AM, Karel Piwko wrote:
> > > On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:31:36 -0400
> > > Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 09/17/2013 11:17 AM, Karel Piwko wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> I went once again through
> > >>>
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2013-June/002901.html-
> > >>> which says that Sender API should be fire&forget. It feels more
like
> > >>> "maybe fire"&forget, for instance it does not say
that your
> credentials
> > >>> were wrong
> > >>> - or it says, you need parse logs to get that information.
> > >>>
> > >>> If I think about Android, iOS, JS solutions to communicate with
> > >>> UnifiedPush we provide - Pipes - they always provide a callback to
> be
> > >>> executed on success/failure. Could we add callback to Sender API?
Or
> > >>> should not Aerogear rather have something like Pipes abstraction
> for Java
> > >>> developers instead of pretty dumb Sender API?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thoughts?
> > >> In a bit of crazy land perhaps the client could keep a web socket or
> BSD
> > >> Socket open to the server which would let it get callbacks about
> things
> > >> that happen further down the tree.
> > > Isn't this land called vert.x?
> > Maybe I misunderstood. I thought it was wanting to get information from
> > the push server about the status of messages being sent not the response
> > of the commands to the push server itself.
>
> I was speaking about the latter.
>
> > >
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>>
> > >>> Karel
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>