iOS is also semi automatic ;-)
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Of course. My point was just to be clear we can't do it
"automatic" :)
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> but the android sdk could have a method for uploading the metrics, so
> that a developer can opt for having that displayed on the dashboard.
>
> This method can then also be used for cordova ;)
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Just to be clear, we are talking about metrics for messages delivered
> >>> (received on device) or about really read/open?
> >>>
> >>> Because in Android land is not possible know when message was
> >>> read/opened. We delegate how the message will be delivered/showed to
> the
> >>> MessageHandler[1] and we don't have access to it.
> >>
> >>
> >> when the user clicks on the message, the app opens. That's what we
> track
> >> w/ this PR, not the actual: I read the message - more "App was opened
> due to
> >> push", see:
> >>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-971
> >
> >
> > I can't do that. I can't do an action when app was opened. To do that
we
> > would need to create our own application[1] class, and all projects
> would
> > need to extend it. As I have told in my previous email, for now I only
> can
> > do something when the message is delivered to the device.
> >
> > [1]
http://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/Application.html
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Today we only have access when the message is delivered. Basically we
> >>> receive the message in a AeroGearGCMMessageReceiver[2] do some checks
> and
> >>> push the message for all Handles registered[3][4]
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>>
>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android-push/blob/master/aerogear-an...
> >>> [2]
> >>>
>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android-push/blob/master/aerogear-an...
> >>> [3]
> >>>
>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android-push/blob/master/aerogear-an...
> >>> [4]
> >>>
>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android-push/blob/master/aerogear-an...
> >>>
> >>> -- Passos
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <
> matzew(a)apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> as discussed on the previous thread, there will be a new endpoint
to
> >>>> 'track' the "App opened/launched due to received push
notification".
> >>>>
> >>>> Internally, on the UPS, the Push Message has an ID, which get's
> append
> >>>> to the payload of the notification, like here:
> >>>>
> >>>>
>
https://github.com/matzew/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/analytics/push...
> >>>>
> >>>> On the client SDKs this will be read and a HTTP call made to the
soon
> >>>> introduced MetricsEndpoint. Currently this info is send to the
> >>>> RegistrationEndpoint, including the deviceToken/registrationId.
> However, I
> >>>> think that the deviceToken/registrationId is currently not needed
for
> >>>> metrics, since we are just interested in anonymous "app
> launched/opened due
> >>>> to push", and not a specific "DEVICE X did open, while
DEVICE Y did
> not yet
> >>>> open".
> >>>>
> >>>> So all we really need is the ID of the push notification, to be
> >>>> processed by our Metrics Service
> >>>>
> >>>>
>
https://github.com/matzew/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/analytics/jaxr...
> >>>>
> >>>> Therefore my proposal is have an endpoint:
> >>>>
> >>>> PUT /metrics/pushmessage/{pushMessageID}
> >>>>
> >>>> I think PUT is good/best, because there is nothing really created
on
> the
> >>>> server, it's more updating the 'counter' on the
existing
> >>>> PushMessageInformation object.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts?
> >>>> -Matthias
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>
> >> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -- Passos
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Erik Jan
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
-- Passos
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev