On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit(a)redhat.com> wrote:
The cordova crypto plugin can't follow the javascript one-to-one
as all
the calls have to be asynchronous. So it's not as simple as a dependency,
I'll have to change the javascript api of the plugin to follow the
javascript. It's a bit dependency hell as it depends on everything iOS
android and javascript. Perhaps it would be good for Cordova to have it's
own deadline.
Thanks for the insights! This now also explains my first question: why not
'addressed' last week.
IMO this is really something we need to address... So yes, I am def. for a
separate release/life-cycle!
-Matthias
Cheers,
Erik Jan
On 19 Nov,2013, at 11:14 , Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
A few questions:
* The best is to "suck in" the 'latest' JS dependency via npm (or
similar,
or by hand), right ?
* If yes... doesn't it generally make sense to release the Cordova bits a
bit AFTER its core dependencies ? On iOS we did the same (yesterday I moved
the Crypto to CocoaPods, today Christos is sucking that in, via CocoaPods
(on aerogear-ios)
-Matthias
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit(a)redhat.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Last tuesday the PR for the new javascript crypto api landed, because I
>> developed the crypto cordova plugin based on the 'old' api there is now
a
>> discrepancy between the 'current' javascript crypto api and the cordova
>> one. We could change that this week as there aren't that many people that
>> use the crypto cordova plugin, but we have frozen so what is the point of a
>> freeze when we change things regardless?
>>
>> Anyway I think we could still change this what do you think?
>>
>
> yes, I think updating the Cordova bits makes sense.
>
> Quote from yesterdays team meeting:
> <quote>
> 15:22:50 <qmx> #info qmx proposes to freeze this friday (as an exception
> to android), freeze this friday, release next week, announce after the
> holiday"
> </quote>
>
> So the freeze is this week, and IMO that's perfectly fine to update it.
>
>
> That said, but I think the only question I really have is why this update
> to reflect the 'new' API was not addressed already last week.
>
> Greetings,
> Matthias
>
>
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Erik Jan
>>
>> p.s.
>> have a look at the differences:
>>
>> current javascript api
>>
>>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/blob/master/tests/unit/crypto/aer...
>>
>> current cordova api
>>
>>
https://github.com/edewit/aerogear.org/blob/f2fe8a48b2f9d9c581e62292abeaf...
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev