The only use case I am really interested in for "simple map based"
caching is the test suite. Its the whole reason I did not do the things
Strong and I discussed on the other thread already.
Perhaps we move "simple map based" caching impl to the hibernate-testing
module? The the test suite can continue to use it but we have
explicitly published the intent.
And yes I totally agree that we should be driving folks to proper cache
integrations, namely the infinispan and/or ehcache integrations. The
others (oscache, swarmcache, etc) have been removed already.
On 06/08/2011 07:26 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
I always try to understand what's the main reason motivating
people to
use it. Likely the zero dependencies, "let's just try one" ?
We could bake a very simple implementation based as you say on a
ConcurrentHashMap, and implement a simple eviction is simple. But I'm
afraid that offering such a feature would drive away from proper
implementations, which we should encourage to use.
Sanne
2011/6/8 Emmanuel Bernard<emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>:
> I always die a little when I see someone using HashtableCacheProvider.
>
> What do you think of removing it entirely. Worse case, we could provide an
implementation that is backed by ConcurrentHashMap but even with that, we would get no
eviction policy etc.
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
--
Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>
http://hibernate.org