Hi Max, could you make an example please?
Looks like you are interpreting Steve's email in a different way than me.
On 24 Jul 2015 21:43, "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:48, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Do we want to consider automatically applying known database limits on
> various identifier lengths? This is trickier to implement than it
> might
> sound. And it would definitely need to wait for the reworking of
> annotation binding. But in general I wonder if y'all see this as a
> desirable feature. And if so, should that be just for implicit names?
> Or
> explicit names as well?
I could see it be valuable for easier cross db testing, but all users
custom queries
would be easily broken unless you have something very deterministic.
If we do it think I as a user would prefer at least get a warning or be
able to turn on "strict" mode
to catch issues where I did not realise
"MY_SUPER_AWESOME_COLUMN_NAME_CANT_ALWAYS_BE_USED".
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev