11:41 a.m.
Ahh okay, I see. Sorry, I didn't fully read my previous mail and forgot
I asked that question ^^
Well then I'll try upgrading to 5.2 and hope for the best :)
So are you considering merging that to 5.2 then?
Am 23.09.2016 um 18:36 schrieb Steve Ebersole:
Nope. You asked:
Are the problems with Hibernate 5.1+ and Infinispan fixed yet? I didn't
consider upgrading yet because I read of some issues.
Now its possibly I misread your reference to HIbernate+Infinispan
problems to mean the only ones I know of. hence the HHH-10707
reference. If you meant some other "Hibernate 5.1+ and Infinispan"
problem, then I guess you could have been more specific ;)
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:33 AM Christian Beikov
<christian.beikov(a)gmail.com <mailto:christian.beikov@gmail.com>> wrote:
Wrong thread?
Am 23.09.2016 um 17:53 schrieb Steve Ebersole:
> There are some conceptual mismatch problem that IMO stem from the
> L2C SPI. We are discussing that all as part of
> https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-10707
>
> Whether that affects you really depends how you configure
> caching. If you try to reuse regions for different types of data
> (entity, collection, etc) then it will affect you. If you define
> different access strategies for the same region then it will
> affect you.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:02 AM Christian Beikov
> <christian.beikov(a)gmail.com <mailto:christian.beikov@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Well to be fair, I already reported that this "regression" was
> introduced in 4.2.8 by placing the ON predicate on the target
> table join
> instead of the collection table join as was done before in
> 4.2.7.SP1.
> I am not using 4.x anymore but since Wildfly ships with
> Hibernate 5.0, I
> suppose that others could benefit from this too.
> Are the problems with Hibernate 5.1+ and Infinispan fixed
> yet? I didn't
> consider upgrading yet because I read of some issues.
>
>
> Regards,
> Christian
>
> Am 22.09.2016 um 22:10 schrieb Gail Badner:
> > Hi Christian,
> >
> > We are only backporting critical issues and regressions to
> 5.0 at this
> > point, so it can't be backported to 5.0. If no regressions
> caused by
> > this fix are reported in 5.2, I would consider backporting
> to 5.1.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gail
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Christian Beikov
> > <christian.beikov(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:christian.beikov@gmail.com>
> <mailto:christian.beikov@gmail.com
> <mailto:christian.beikov@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, I know that it's a beauty ^^
> > Hope this can get into all 5.x branches?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Christian
> > Am 20.09.2016 um 23:05 schrieb Steve Ebersole:
> > > I took a quick look. I'd prefer to see better
> solution as we
> > migrate
> > > to SQM; but for 5.x, given how Hibernate generates
> SQL there, I
> > am not
> > > sure how else you would possibly do this
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:54 PM Vlad Mihalcea
> > > <mihalcea.vlad(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:mihalcea.vlad@gmail.com>
> <mailto:mihalcea.vlad@gmail.com
<mailto:mihalcea.vlad@gmail.com>>
> > <mailto:mihalcea.vlad@gmail.com
> <mailto:mihalcea.vlad@gmail.com>
> <mailto:mihalcea.vlad@gmail.com
> <mailto:mihalcea.vlad@gmail.com>>>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > I'm going to review it tomorrow.
> > >
> > > Vlad
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Christian Beikov <
> > >christian.beikov(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:christian.beikov@gmail.com>
> <mailto:christian.beikov@gmail.com
> <mailto:christian.beikov@gmail.com>>
> > <mailto:christian.beikov@gmail.com
> <mailto:christian.beikov@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:christian.beikov@gmail.com
> <mailto:christian.beikov@gmail.com>>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey again,
> > > >
> > > > I implemented the approach that I proposed in
> the issue and a
> > > test in
> > > >
> https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/1561
> > <https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/1561>
> > > >
> > > > It detects left joins with join tables that use
> the target
> > table
> > > alias.
> > > > The join table is replaced with a subquery and
> the WITH clause
> > > is moved
> > > > to the join of the subquery.
> > > >
> > > > Any comments?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Christian
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > hibernate-dev mailing list
> > > > hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> > <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
> > <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> > <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org>>>
> > >
> >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> > <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev>
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > hibernate-dev mailing list
> > > hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> > <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
> > <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> > <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org>>>
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> > <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev>
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > hibernate-dev mailing list
> > hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> > <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev>
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>