I'd put it at the same place as the boolean parameter in Emmanuel's
prototype: when creating the ValidatorFactor/Validator (e.g.
inHibernateValidatorConfiguration).
So "parameter" was not meant as in "method parameter" but more as in
"configuration attribute" :-)
2010/10/5 Hardy Ferentschik <hibernate(a)ferentschik.de>
Where exactly do you want to add the parameter? To the
Validator.validateXYZ() methods?
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:54:10 +0200, Gunnar Morling <
gunnar.morling(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
Hi,
>
> a use case might be a data-centric application, where you for performance
> reasons don't want to validate graphs completely once a failure occured,
> but
> don't want to face the user with single validation errors one after the
> other either.
>
> Specifying the validation order would surely be useful. But I wouldn't tie
> these things together. I suggest to introduce a numeric parameter and for
> a
> start either make clear that the validation order is not specified or only
> support values 0 (don't stop on first error) and 1 (= failFast). Later on,
> if validation order is spec'd, other values than these could easily be
> supported. If we now introduce a boolean parameter, the API would be
> somewhat "polluted" if we come up with a numeric parameter later on. Then
> we
> either had two parameters (leaving space for inconsistent configurations)
> or
> had to remove the boolean parameter again.
>
> Gunnar
>
>
> 2010/10/4 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>
>
> Ive been toying with the number idea while talking with Max.
>> Im not sure what use case that solves provided the highly unpredictable
>> nature of what's get returned.
>>
>> It might be more useful and get a usecase if we spec what gets returned
>> roughly. Like deep-last algorithm etc.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4 oct. 2010, at 22:17, Gunnar Morling <gunnar.morling(a)googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I like the idea. Emmanuel's performance test showed an execution time per
>> validation of 11 vs. 74 ms on my system, so there seems to be some
>> potential. Instead of having a "failFast" flag one could also introduce
a
>> numeric parameter to control, when validation should stop. A value of
"1"
>> would be equal to the flag being true, but one could also decide to stop
>> just after 3 validation errors for instance.
>>
>> Gunnar
>>
>>
>> 2010/10/4 Emmanuel Bernard < <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>
>> emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>
>>
>> That or slowish validations.
>>>
>>> One typical use case is that:
>>>
>>> if ( validator.validate(customer,
>>> StraightToValidationScreen.class).size()
>>> >0 ) {
>>> //manual process
>>> }
>>> else {
>>> //automatic process
>>> }
>>>
>>> BTW, I've committed a non scientific perf test that shows an average of
>>> 5x
>>> perf improvement on an object graph of 5 object (one master and 4
>>> children)
>>> and 4 constraints on A and 3 on B. Around 22ms vs 120 ms. (log4j logs
>>> set to
>>> ERROR). The perf change is visible even on smallish graphs.
>>>
>>> It can be worthwhile.
>>>
>>> On 4 oct. 2010, at 16:20, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>>>
>>> > What would be the usecase? Saving time in large object graphs where I
>>> am
>>> only interested in whether there is a
>>> > failure at all? You really need LARGE object graphs to make this worth
>>> while.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:45:34 +0200, Emmanuel Bernard <<
>>> emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>
>>> emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> <
http://github.com/emmanuelbernard/hibernate-validator/commits/failFast
>>> >
>>>
http://github.com/emmanuelbernard/hibernate-validator/commits/failFast
>>> >>
>>> >> What do you guys think?
>>> >>
>>> >> The idea is to stop a the first failure.
>>> >> You can enable that :
>>> >> - by property
>>> >> - at config time
>>> >> - when the Validator is created
>>> >>
>>> >> Look at
>>> >>
>>> <
>>>
http://github.com/emmanuelbernard/hibernate-validator/blob/failFast/hiber...
>>> >
>>>
>>>
http://github.com/emmanuelbernard/hibernate-validator/blob/failFast/hiber...
>>> >> for code examples.
>>> >>
>>> >> Emmanuel
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> <hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org>hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
>>> <
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>