Going to throw another perhaps crazy suggestion out there...
Thinking we should consider:
1) branching 4.1
2) integrating my JPA 2.1 work onto master
3) merge master (with JPA 2.1) to metamodel branch
Couple of thought processes go into this. First, I do not see us doing
anymore 4.x releases outside of possibly doing a 4.2 *specifically* to
release JPA 2.1 support. Ideally I want JPA 2.1 support to be released
as 5.0 hand-in-hand with the metamodel work. The only reason we would
not go that route is if the metamodel work drags on and threatens us
releasing JPA 2.1 support in a timely manner. I do not see that
happening, just stating a known condition. Besides the JPA 2.1 support
is actually up-to-date with the latest available specs (and actually a
little bit ahead of the latest available spec draft after this week).
So again, all-in-all I still do not foresee the need for a 4.2 at this time.
On 07/15/2012 08:27 AM, Strong Liu wrote:
Hi there,
I think we should do this again since there are some changes in master that I want to use
in metamodel, and maybe we should do this regularly to minimize the conflicts?
Steve is the best to do this, since he already did this once, but in case he is busying
on other stuff, I'm voluntarily to do this .
WDYT?
-------------------------
Best Regards,
Strong Liu <stliu at hibernate.org>
http://about.me/stliu/bio
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
--
steve(a)hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org