Give me the spec paragraph that says that field has priority over
getter.
Where is the spec that says getter has priority over field ? :)
In a separate discussion with the Dali (eclipse jpa tooling) team it seems like
for orm.xml it is not at all specified and thus left up to interpretation of the vendor
and it seems the ref implementation (eclipselink) takes the opposite approach to
this than Hibernate and we get stuck in the middle.
The "fix" seems to be that the validation in eclipse will be customizable to
which default
it should validate against.
/max
On 1 juil. 2010, at 11:06, Andersen Max <max.andersen(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> The spec dedicates a whole paragraph about the default access type using
>> using annotations, but I could
>> not find anything regarding the default access type using orm.xml only. It
>> seems it is up to
>> the implementor to decide on the the default. Why would you consider
>> 'property' access to be the wrong default?
>
> The problem is that eclipse tooling tries and validate if the orm.xml actually maps
to something
> "legal".
>
> Currently the default for orm.xml seem to be field access first thus it fails
validation if there is no
> matching field.
>
> The Eclipse tooling claims to be following the JPA spec thus why we are asking what
Hibernate
> is basing its choice on.
>
> /max
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev