Sanne, you just said it.. the reason you did not test with 5.2 before it
was released is time. Me doing a CR release does not change that. The
stuff that "bit you" in 5.2 was available for testing for well over a month
prior to releasing 5.2. And it's not like 5.2 was released without
discussion; heck we even pushed it back a few times to get a few extras
in. All discussed on the dev list.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 7:55 AM Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
+1
I've also hit some incompatible API changes which I only figured out
too late (when attempting to upgrade Hibernate Search).
I could have pre-tested snapshot builds but didn't have time for that
- and didn't expect 5.2 to be released without a Beta period, or I
would have made time for that.
On 8 June 2016 at 08:09, Vlad Mihalcea <mihalcea.vlad(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have seen the frustration from the Spring Data team trying to keep up
> with our code changes that break their integrations,
> and I was wondering if we should use some Release candidates prior to
> releasing a start of a branch, even if it's a minor one.
> This way, instead of 5.2.0, we could release 5.2.0.RC1 or something like
> that to mark it as an intermediary release that's aimed for early
> adopters/integrators.
>
> Do you think this is feasible or is there something to prevent us from
> doing this?
>
> Vlad
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev