Re: [hibernate-dev] [HSEARCH] Proposal to change the default value of Field#norms()

Hi Emmanuel, > Can you open a JIRA issue to clarify this in http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/search/4.1/reference/en-US/html_single/#b... ? > Even better, can you propose the change as a GitHub pull request? :) Sure. :-) >> >> @Field(boost=(a)Boost(1.2f), norms = Norms.NO) >> private String description; >> >> Would I see a warning or maybe an error message from Hibernate Search? >> Does make such combination sense? > > I don't think we raise an exception, we should do something indeed. Do you want to open the JIRA and possibly provide a patch via a GitHub pull request? OK, I will do that. But creating patch will take some time. >> Btw Is it possible that OIDs added to index by IndexedEmbedded have >> norms? Luke shows me it in two different indexes. Could someone >> else please verify it? If it is the case, it would be nice if Hibernate Search >> would have the same behavior for OIDs added to index either >> by DocumentId or by IndexedEmbedded, e.g. index them with >> NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS. > > I am not following you. What's an OID. Suppose you have following classes: @Entity public PostalAddress {    @Id    private String OID;    ..... } @Entity @Indexed public Partner {    @Id    private String OID;    @OneToOne    @IndexEmbedded(depth = 1)    private PostalAddress defaultAddress;   .... } The Lucene document for Partner would contain the field OID from Partner indexed with NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS and it will contain also the field "defaultAddress.OID". But the field "defaultAddress.OID" would have norms. This is what I see at least with Luke in my indexes. I think the field "defaultAddress.OID" should be also indexed with NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS.

Best regards Andrej Golovnin _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev