On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:16:54 +0200, Sanne Grinovero
<sanne.grinovero(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I don't really understand the need for
"AUTOMATIC/NO/YES",
if it is possible to reuse the filter (i.e. it is safe) why shouldn't
you?
Maybe you are already using your own custom filter which implements the
cahching of the bitset itself. In this case you still want this filter
instance being cached, but not wrapped.
--Hardy