Re: [hibernate-dev] JPA merge question about detached entity with lazy fields that haven't been fetched...
On 05/16/2012 10:16 AM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
On 16 mai 2012, at 14:28, Scott Marlow wrote:
> According to JPA 2.0 specification section 3.2.7.1, when merging a
> detached entity with lazy associations that haven't been fetched:
>
> "
> The persistence provider must not merge fields marked LAZY that have not
> been fetched: it must ignore such fields when merging.
> "
>
>
> After merging an entity, will accessing one of the entities LAZY fields
> (that was previously not fetched) result in a lazy initialization error
> or will we try to fetch from the database?
The latter.
The latter isn't working for me yet (I get a
"LazyInitializationException: failed to lazily initialize a collection
of role"), I'll try recreating in a Hibernate ORM test case.