8:21 a.m.
Hi,
Now that more and more projects switched to maven, are there any plans to
deploy the maven generated site as publicly
available documentation? And if so, has anyone worked on a Hibernate style
for such a site?
--Hardy
9:42 a.m.
I've always found the Maven generated sites quite unintuitive. Not as
unintuitive as Maven itself though.
On Feb 10, 2009, at 15:21, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
Hi,
Now that more and more projects switched to maven, are there any
plans to deploy the maven generated site as publicly
available documentation? And if so, has anyone worked on a Hibernate
style for such a site?
--Hardy
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
11:27 a.m.
I have thought about it some.
There are difficulties though in what I actually want to see versus what
the maven site plugin actually generates. I was suggested on #maven
that the older site generator (forget the name atm) might be a better
fit.
Really I wanted to have the generated site be useful as the
infrastructure for the distribution bundle...
-
Steve Ebersole
Project Lead
http://hibernate.org
steve(a)hibernate.org
Principal Software Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://jboss.com
http://redhat.com
steve.ebersole(a)jboss.com
steve.ebersole(a)redhat.com
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 15:21 +0100, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
Hi,
Now that more and more projects switched to maven, are there any plans to
deploy the maven generated site as publicly
available documentation? And if so, has anyone worked on a Hibernate style
for such a site?
--Hardy
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
12:32 p.m.
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:27:12 +0100, Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>
wrote:
There are difficulties though in what I actually want to see versus
what
the maven site plugin actually generates.
What is it you don't like and you couldn't configurate?
I was suggested on #maven
that the older site generator (forget the name atm) might be a better
fit.
Would it be possible to use the 'old' site generator? How?
I actually like some of the default reports and could imagine that with
some
custom site structure including for example the generated docbook
documentation
the maven site could actually work. At least for a simple project as
Hibernate Validator.
For the multi module Core things might look differently.
--Hardy
4:22 p.m.
Its been a while since I looked at it. But from what I recall it was
all stuff related to having multiple modules and combining some outputs
and not others and where things resided and the links on the combined
"landing page".
The reports are independent of the site plugin. The site plugin simply
aggregates outputs from various "reporting" plugins. You can still run
those reporting plugins regardless of whether you then aggregate them
with 'site'.
-
Steve Ebersole
Project Lead
http://hibernate.org
steve(a)hibernate.org
Principal Software Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://jboss.com
http://redhat.com
steve.ebersole(a)jboss.com
steve.ebersole(a)redhat.com
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 19:32 +0100, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:27:12 +0100, Steve Ebersole
<steve(a)hibernate.org>
wrote:
> There are difficulties though in what I actually want to see versus what
> the maven site plugin actually generates.
What is it you don't like and you couldn't configurate?
> I was suggested on #maven
> that the older site generator (forget the name atm) might be a better
> fit.
Would it be possible to use the 'old' site generator? How?
I actually like some of the default reports and could imagine that with
some
custom site structure including for example the generated docbook
documentation
the maven site could actually work. At least for a simple project as
Hibernate Validator.
For the multi module Core things might look differently.
--Hardy
5814
days inactive
5814
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Emmanuel Bernard -
Hardy Ferentschik -
Steve Ebersole