On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Mircea Markus <mmarkus(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 21 May 2013, at 17:09, Dan Berindei <dan.berindei(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I wouldn't want to deprecate CCL, I think it definitely has a purpose -
at least in invalidation mode.
The only use case I'm aware of for invalidation is 2nd level cache and I
don't think that needs a remote cache, Galder wdyt?
I don't know if 2nd level cache actually uses ClusterCacheLoader, but it
could definitely use it without exposing the cache through HotRod.
> Even in replication mode, having a lazy alternative to state transfer
may be useful. Maybe not for the topology cache, but it might make sense
for large caches.
this makes me wonder: what would be the case in which one doesn't want to
use state transfer for a distributed/replicated cache.
In replication mode, if the cache has a huge (non-shared) cache store, some
users may prefer to disable fetchPersistentState and rely on
ClusterCacheLoader instead for less frequently accessed keys.
I don't know if it ever makes sense to use ClusterCacheLoader in
distribution mode, since it always sends the ClusteredGetCommand to the
entire cluster.
Cheers
Dan