Sounds good to me, we should have a little more breathing room after the
NBST alpha to look at the state transfer integration.
Cheers
Dan
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Mircea Markus <mircea.markus(a)jboss.com>wrote:
Hi guys,
I've just had a chat with the CloudTM team(CC) around the integration of
TOB/TOA[1] into Infinispan. Here are some points:
- the TOB and TOA code has been reviewed in detail by us. The only part
missing is the state transfer integration
- there's not a lot of sense in integrating TOB/TOM over the existing
state transfer as we would not back port that to 5.1 and it would be
dropped in 5.2
- CloudTM would rebase the TOB/TOA work on top of the alpha NBST[2](ATM
planned at the end of next week/3 Aug) and we'll integrate that
- first releases of the TOB/TOA would be marked as experimental in 5.2
How does that sound?
Cheers,
Mircea
[1] TOA used to be referred to as TOM (M from multicast). In JGroups
terminology that's an Anycast, so we decided to be consistent with that and
use TOAnycast.
[2]
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/Non-blockingStateTransfer
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev