Re: [infinispan-dev] First working version of lock/unlock API
On 5/19/09 9:33 AM, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
> 8. Test that locks are NOT released despite unlock if the key is
> modified in the tx. Should only unlock on commit/rollback in this case.
>
I finished all tests except 8. I am confused with implied semantic of
unlock. What is the point of having unlock then? If we are allowing
locking with transactions only why do we need unlock?
Thought a little bit more about this. Does point 8 imply that key should
be released on unlock if it was *not* modified and on commit/rollback if
it was modified?