Re: [infinispan-dev] First working version of lock/unlock API

On 5/19/09 9:33 AM, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote: >> 8. Test that locks are NOT released despite unlock if the key is >> modified in the tx. Should only unlock on commit/rollback in this >> case. >> > I finished all tests except 8. I am confused with implied semantic > of unlock. What is the point of having unlock then? If we are > allowing locking with transactions only why do we need unlock? > Thought a little bit more about this. Does point 8 imply that key should be released on unlock if it was *not* modified and on commit/ rollback if it was modified?